Center for the Defence of the Individual - HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision
Judgment | Judgment / Supreme Court | 05.10.2009
HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision
HCJ decision in the application under the contempt of court ordinance filed by HaMoked against the state’s delaying implementation of the three-year-old judgment which found the route of the separation wall in the vicinity of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas was unlawful and therefore null and void. The court severely criticizes the state’s conduct in the case and finds that such conduct, which indicates the state treats the court’s judgments as mere recommendations, is unacceptable. The court, therefore, charged the state with the petitioners’ expenses to the sum of 20,000 NIS.

Related documents

array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } } array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } } array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
04.07.2005 | עיתונות
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009
16.11.2009 | תכתובת עקרונית
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance
28.09.2008 | בקשה
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment
15.06.2006 | פסיקה / עליון
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response
19.02.2006 | תגובה
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners
25.09.2005 | הודעה
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response
30.06.2005 | תגובה
Read more
array(10) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "215_update" ["title"]=> string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi
20.03.2005 | עתירה לבג"ץ
Read more