Related documents
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
04.07.2005 | עיתונות
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009
16.11.2009 | תכתובת עקרונית
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance
28.09.2008 | בקשה
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment
15.06.2006 | פסיקה / עליון
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response
19.02.2006 | תגובה
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners
25.09.2005 | הודעה
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response
30.06.2005 | תגובה
array(10) {
[0]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "847_update"
["title"]=>
string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 "
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[1]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(10) "215_update"
["title"]=>
string(268) "The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(7) "updates"
}
[2]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6657"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6448"
["title"]=>
string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_47"
}
[3]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_30"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6658"
}
[4]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_17"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6656"
}
[5]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(4) "03_1"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6654"
}
[6]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6547"
}
[7]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_26"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6544"
}
[8]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-06-30 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(80) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_23"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6449"
}
[9]=>
array(5) {
["di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
["documentDate"]=>
string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00"
["title"]=>
string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi"
["type_di_name"]=>
string(5) "03_22"
["related_di_name"]=>
string(4) "6445"
}
}
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi
20.03.2005 | עתירה לבג"ץ
