Center for the Defence of the Individual - Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05
العربية HE wheel chair icon
Back to previous page
Display File
04.07.2005|Articles|Press

Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05

Updates

In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000
06.10.2009
Read more
The High Court of Justice accepted HaMoked’s petition against the route of the separation wall that cut off access to hundreds of dunams of farmland of residents of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas villages. State required to pay NIS 50,000 to the petitioners for expenses
15.06.2006
Read more

Related documents

HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response
30.06.2005 | Response to Petition
Read more
HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment
30.06.2004 | Judgment / Supreme Court
Read more

Related topics

Separation Wall