Center for the Defence of the Individual - HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response
التحديثات HE wheel chair icon
Display File
Court Documents | Response to Petition | 30.06.2005
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Response

In the petition on the route of the separation wall near the villages Azzun and Nabi Ilyas, the State admits that the reason the wall does not run adjacent to the settlement Tzufin is the outline plan for the settlement, which intended to turn the annexed territory into an industrial zone. It is worth noting that a previous petition on the subject was rejected because the HCJ accepted the State's claim that the justification for the route was security. The State adds that, had the wall in the area been planned today, it would not have taken the settlement's outline plan into consideration. Be that as it may, and despite the serious harm to the residents of the villages, the State claims that the wall's route should not be changed now due to the high cost of doing so.

Updates

In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000
06.10.2009
Read more

Related documents

array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } } array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_
04.07.2005 | עיתונות
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_
09.07.2004 | פסיקה / טריבונל בינלאומי
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment
30.06.2004 | פסיקה / עליון
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009
16.11.2009 | תכתובת עקרונית
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision
05.10.2009 | פסיקה / עליון
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance
28.09.2008 | בקשה
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment
15.06.2006 | פסיקה / עליון
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response
19.02.2006 | תגובה
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners
25.09.2005 | הודעה
Read more
array(11) { [0]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(10) "847_update" ["title"]=> string(511) "In a decision on an application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance filed by HaMoked regarding the state’s delay in implementing the judgment establishing that the route of the separation wall in the area of the villages of ‘Azzun and An Nabi Elyas is unlawful and therefore null and void, the court harshly criticized the state’s conduct in the case: In the decision, the court emphasized that its judgments are not merely recommendations and ordered the state to pay expenses to the sum of NIS 20,000 " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-06 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(7) "updates" } [1]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6448" ["title"]=> string(114) "Y. Yoaz, "State to High Court: Fence route determined not only by security considerations", Haaretz 4.7.05_x000D_ " ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-07-04 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_47" } [2]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6125" ["title"]=> string(119) "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory_x000D_ Advisory Opinion_x000D_" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-07-09 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_37" } [3]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6449" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6520" ["title"]=> string(95) "HCJ 2056/04 - Beit Sourik Village Council et al. v. The Government of Israel et al._ Judgment" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2004-06-30 00:00:00" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" } [4]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-11-16 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(199) "Re: HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Decision regarding contempt of court dated 5 October and updating notice on your behalf dated 24 September 2009" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_30" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6658" } [5]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2009-10-05 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(92) "HCJ 2732/05 Head of the ‘Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. decision" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6657" } [6]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2008-09-28 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(132) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of the 'Azzun City Council et al. v. the State of Israel et al. Application under the Contempt of Court Ordinance" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_17" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6656" } [7]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-06-15 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(87) "HCJ 2732/05 - Head of Azzun City Council et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Judgment" ["type_di_name"]=> string(4) "03_1" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6654" } [8]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2006-02-19 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Respondents' Supplementary Response" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_23" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6547" } [9]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-09-25 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(94) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Notice on behalf of the Petitioners" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_26" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6544" } [10]=> array(5) { ["di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" ["documentDate"]=> string(19) "2005-03-20 00:00:00" ["title"]=> string(82) "HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi" ["type_di_name"]=> string(5) "03_22" ["related_di_name"]=> string(4) "6445" } }
HCJ 2732/05 - Hassin et al. v. Government of Israel et al. Petition for Order Nisi
20.03.2005 | עתירה לבג"ץ
Read more

Related topics

Separation Wall Separation Wall