Center for the Defence of the Individual - HCJ 1336/16, 1337/16, 1777/16 - Atrash, Abu Kaf, Tawil et al. v. GOC Home Front Command Request for expansion of panel and dates for the parties' supplementary arguments on the lawfulness of using Regulation 119
العربية HE wheel chair icon
חזרה לעמוד הקודם
Display File
27.03.2016|Court Documents|Application

HCJ 1336/16, 1337/16, 1777/16 - Atrash, Abu Kaf, Tawil et al. v. GOC Home Front Command Request for expansion of panel and dates for the parties' supplementary arguments on the lawfulness of using Regulation 119

Updates

The HCJ dismissed HaMoked’s request for an expanded panel hearing on the issue of punitive demolition: “the hearing of the petitions has concluded and in the circumstances of these petitions we have not seen fit to grant the request”
29.03.2016
Read more
HaMoked to the HCJ on the issue of legality of punitive demolition: the time is ripe for a discussion of the principle issues before an expanded panel, in view of the fact that six of the justices are in favour of revisiting the prevailing case law
27.03.2016
Read more

Related documents

HCJ 1336/16, 1337/16, 1721/16, 1777/16 - Atrash, Abu Kaf, Dwayat, Tawil et al. v. GOC Home Front Command Notice on behalf of the Respondent
16.03.2016 | הודעה
Read more
HCJ 1336/16, 1337/16, 1721/16, 1777/16 - Atrash, Abu Kaf, Dwayat, Tawil et al. v. GOC Home Front Command Hearing transcript
09.03.2016 | פרוטוקול
Read more
HCJ 1777/16 - Tawil et al. v. GOC Home Front Command Petition
02.03.2016 | עתירה לבג"ץ
Read more
HCJ 1336/16 - Atrash et al. v. GOC Home Front Command Petition
17.02.2016 | עתירה לבג"ץ
Read more
HCJ 1336/16, 1337/16,1721/16, 1777/16 - Atrash et al. v. GOC Home-Front Command Judgment
03.04.2016 | פסיקה / עליון
Read more

Related topics

House Demolitions